DO "OUTSIDE FORCES" AFFECT OUR PLANET?
by William Hutton
gary d. goodwin
limit their attention to earth impactors, it is wise to remember that there
are more things "in Heaven and Earth" to be concerned about. No doubt
that asteroids and comets are a part of the picture, they're just not the entire
picture. In a single movement of concern we can easily become blinded to a greater
power. It is well established that Electromagnetic Forces control these threatening
beasts that have so often plagued our thoughts. However, like the little boy
that is afraid of the monster under his bed, he is very unaware of the many
beasts lurking out on the night time streets. We must remain holistic in thought
and attention. While impactors are indeed a real and sure threat, remember that
there are many other forces to consider - the solar environment, the galactic
field and its constituents, and even the earth beneath our feet. In
addition to impactor studies, TMG has been the research group to bring many
of these issues to light. We encourage our readers to continue to be open and
inquisitive. And as William Hutton asks in this
timely article - are there even greater powers that are in control, are we failing
to look beyond the mark as a culture and society? In the final days of accomplishment
of the human race, it will surely be noted that it was ignorance that destroyed
the world and its ideas. And that Day is surely upon us.
Sugrue was the only author who knew and investigated America's best documented
psychic, Edgar Cayce, while Cayce was alive. In a talk that he gave in 1941,
Sugrue touched upon the entanglement of souls with the Earth.
When a soul took on the consciousness of a portion of creation it separated itself temporarily from the consciousness of its own individuality, and became thus further removed from the consciousness of its spirit. Thus instead of helping to direct the flow of creation, and contributing to it, it found itself in the stream, drifting along with it. The farther it went from shore, the more it succumbed to the pull of the current, the more difficult was the task of getting back.
Each of the systems of stars and planets represented, in this manner, a temptation to the souls; each represented also an opportunity for development, advancement, and growth toward the ideal of complete companionship with God - the position of co-creator in the vast and wonderful system of universal mind.
The solar system attracted souls, and since each system is a single expression, with its planets as integral parts, the Earth came into the path of souls.
It was an expression
of God with its own laws, its own plan, its own evolution. Souls, longing to
feel the beauty of the seas, the winds, the forests, the flowers, mixed with
them and expressed themselves through them. They also mingled with the animals
and made, in imitation of them, thought forms. (This was the Age of Fable, when
gods and goddesses -- the souls -- roamed the Earth, turning into trees, speaking
from rocks, and inhabiting the bodies of Centaurs, Cyclops, and other creatures
which were half animal, half human). But it was a playing, an imitating, that
interfered with what had been set in motion gradually entangling the souls,
so that they became trapped in the plane of Earth's evolution, inside the bodies
they had themselves created.
Many are the geophysical changes that we souls have experienced here in the plane of our evolving planet. This article will focus on some of the potential effects of the extraterrestrial environment on Earth's evolution. The subject was inadequately treated in my book, Coming Earth Changes (CEC) I had merely noted (CEC, p. 249) that five or more Earthly cataclysms had been caused by comet or meteorite impacts within the last 600 million years. The most severe of these had killed more than 95 percent of all marine species.
Effects On The Earth
has recently been an upsurge of interest in extraterrestrial forces that may
have influenced human evolution. Examples are books with titles like Cataclysm!
Compelling Evidence of a Cosmic Catastrophe in 9500 B.C., and Earth
Under Fire, Humanity's Survival of the Apocalypse, discussed below. These
works allege that forces external to Earth have altered it in profound ways
within geologically recent times. And Cayce reading 3976-10 seems to have a
similar theme. When in February 1932 Cayce was asked to forecast "the principal
events for the next fifty years affecting the welfare of the human race,"
This had best be cast after the great catastrophe coming to the world in '36 (1936), in the form of the breaking up of many POWERS that now exist in the world affairs.
The reading goes
on to forecast several political events whose changes "will make the
different MAPS of the world." But at the very end of the reading we
These will not come, as we find, as broken, before the catastrophes of outside forces to the Earth in '36, which will come from the shifting of the equilibrium of the Earth itself in space, with those of the consequential effects on the various portions of the country -- or world -- affected by same.
Then, in another
reading five months later, Cayce was asked, "What will be the
type and extent of the upheaval in '36?" (5748-6, July 1, 1932). The
answer was, "The wars, the upheavals in the interior of the Earth, and
the shifting of same by the differentiation in the axis as respecting positions
from the Polaris center." In CEC (p. 29), I suggested that if there
were a sudden shift in the axis of Earth's independently-spinning inner core
in 1936, it certainly could have caused violent agitation in the ultra-hot fluids
that surround the solid iron core. And that turbulence could cause plumes of
hot, plastic rock to rise from the core-mantle boundary ("upheavals
in the interior of the Earth"). Some rising plumes could easily take
as long as 64 or more years (1936 to 2000) to ascend to a level where they would
start to affect Earth's surface. But just what were the forces that could have
caused a shifting of the equilibrium of the Earth in space? And perhaps more
to the point, how would such forces relate to Earth's evolution?
Remember here that
"....that which comes or begins is first conceived in spirit, grows
in the mental, [and then] manifests in the material" (2072-10).
Did the outside forces that affected the Earth in 1936 originate as spiritually
dark forces? Or were they forces of light from the Godhead? One might lean to
the former speculation inasmuch as the wars -- that were conceived in the minds
of men -- were also mentioned in the reading to be a product of the catastrophe-producing
But one might lean to the latter explanation if the outside forces were related to ongoing expansion of the universe, and simply an expectable part of Earth's evolution. In this case, "the forces" would have caused unenlightened, socially conditioned human beings to start wars. Men would have "forgotten" who rules the "influences of the stars, planets, Sun, and moon," or other elements of the space environment for that matter. As reading 2794-3 puts it, "Do ye rule them, or do they rule you?" We can rule them if as individuals each of us will
self, self's hopes, self's desires. For it has been given from the beginning:
subdue the Earth and its influence; indicating that to be subdued
by tendencies is to become subject to those laws rather than to a creative influence
in a material, mental, and spiritual understanding, controlling through the
abilities of self alone.... (826-15).
Just as we souls
have become entangled in Earth's evolution, so also do we have a way out. Here
in materiality we may realize that
of the Godhead is three-dimensional ....the activity of the motivating force
is three-dimensional -- time, space, and patience (4035-1).
Passive patience, to be sure, has its place; but consider patience rather from the precepts of God's relationship to man: Love unbounded is patience. Love manifested is patience. Endurance at times is patience, consistence ever is patience.... (3161-1).
Not in selfishness, not in grudge, not in wrath; not in any of those things that make for the separation of the I AM from the Creative Forces, or Energy, or God. But the simpleness, the gentleness, the humbleness, the faithfulness, the long-suffering, patience! These be the attributes and those things which the soul takes cognizance of in its walks and activities before men. Not to be seen of men, but that the love may be manifested as the Father has shown through the Son and in the Earth day by day. (518-2).
It would seem,
then, that after 1936 souls on Earth became collectively overwhelmed by the
influences of outside forces. And many may still be, perhaps even to this day.
For the world has experienced numerous brutal wars since 1936. It may seem banal
to say so, but these wars occurred as a result of men's individual and collective
lack of patience.
From another perspective,
within the catastrophe of outside forces in 1936 may lie mankind's redemption.
The looming Earth changes, traced back to the upheavals in the interior of the
Earth in 1936, may -- at a physical level -- wipe away nations' modern war-making
Possible Physical Forces
his book, Earth Under Fire, Paul LaViolette concludes that
explosive activity in the core of our galaxy, the Milky Way, has resulted in
past global catastrophes. He writes that the galactic core periodically enters
an explosive phase. It then generates an intense wind of cosmic ray particles
(electrons, positrons, and protons). These outbursts, which he calls "superwaves,"
may recur about every ten thousand years or more and last from several hundred
to several thousand years. The explosions generate cosmic-rays that travel outward
from the center, at close to the speed of light, and pass through the entire
galactic disk. LaViolette believes that one such volley of cosmic rays passed
through the solar system around the end of the last ice age. He writes that
"for several thousand years [the superwave] injected large amounts of cosmic
dust into our planetary system. This dust substantially altered the Earth's
climate through its effect on the Sun and sunlight transmission through space."
Unaware of Cayce's
reading on the 1936 outside forces, LaViolette had written that superwaves might
have a gravity-gradient component at their forefront. This component, traveling
along with a superwave, could upon its arrival exert a significant tidal pull
or jerk, causing a slight reorientation of Earth's rotational axis. "So
this would be the 'outside force' that Cayce speaks of. It would be of galactic
origin." (Quoted from LaViolette's letter to me of 9/07/98).
Now Cayce reading 5748-6 above may be implying that the axis that shifted was in fact the rotational axis of the independently-spinning inner core, not Earth's overall rotational axis. Supporting this view is a recent study of Earth's wobbling axis of rotation. It spans the years 1890-1997. The analysis shows no clear evidence for a shift in Earth's primary axis of rotation in 1936, as I previously had suggested might be the case (CEC, p. 28) from a study of the International Latitude Service's observations for the period 1932 to 1938. Thus, it seems that perhaps only the axis of Earth's core moved in 1936.
becoming increasingly knowledgeable about massive bursts of gamma-ray energy
impinging on Earth from the depths of the universe. On March 29, 1998, a gamma-ray
burst (GRB) was detected that was among the 4 percent brightest of all GRBs
seen from Earth. The GRB of April 25, 1998, appears to have come from "an
extremely energetic explosion of a massive star....[and was]....ten times that
of previously observed supernovae" (Nature, 10/15/98, p. 672). And
the burst of gamma and X-ray radiation that struck Earth over the Pacific Ocean
on the night of August 27, 1998, was so powerful that it temporarily ionized
the upper atmosphere, just as the Sun does in daytime. "The five-minute-long
flash [from this Milky Way source] saw as much energy as there will be coming
from the Sun for the next 300 years," said K. Hurley, a physicist at Cal
Berkeley. But it reached Earth's surface at a strength equal only to a typical
single dental X-ray. No blast so powerful has ever been detected striking Earth
-- until now. If only sensitive detectors like the ones that picked up this
star's radiation could have been pointed heavenward in 1936! Now if such GRB
energy could affect Earth from just one exploding star, imagine what massive
explosions at the galactic core might do. Perhaps LaViolette's ideas are worthy
Possible Occult Forces
I mean those energies or forces that are hidden, or not easily understood. In
contrast to the physical outside forces discussed above, consider the occult
forces referenced in reading 2072-10:
Q Going back to the Atlantean incarnation -- what was the Tuaoi [pronounced "too-oye"] stone*? Of what shape or form was it?
A It was in the form of a six-sided figure, in which the light appeared as the means of communication between infinity and the finite; or the means whereby there were the communications with those forces from the outside [emphasis added]. Later this came to mean that from which the energies radiated, as of the center from which there were radial activities guiding the various forms of transition or travel through those periods of activity of the Atlanteans.
It was set as a crystal, though in quite a different form from that used there. Do not confuse these two, then, for there were many generations of difference. It was in those periods when there was the directing of aeroplanes, or means of travel; though these in that time would travel in the air, or on the water, or under the water, just the same. Yet the force from which these were directed was in this central power station, or Tuaoi stone; which was as the beam upon which it acted.
In the beginning it was the source from which there was the spiritual and mental contact....First it was the means and source or manner by which the powers that be made the centralization for making known to the children of men, and children of God, the directing forces or powers. [Emphasis added]. Man eventually turned this into that channel for destructive forces -- and it is growing towards this in the present.
Here we have described
certain occult energies that are unmeasurable by today's technologies. These
energies were transformed into destructive forces by Atlanteans in a way that
adversely affected Earth's evolution. But did the energies or forces that affected
the Earth in 1936 have anything to do with the occult forces that activated
the Tuaoi Stone on Atlantis? We'll return to this question at the very end of
*THE MIGHTY ATLANTEAN CRYSTAL, OR TUAOI STONE
The A.R.E. Journal for January 1974, carried an article entitled "The Tuaoi Stone, An Enigma," by Dr. John Sutton, a NASA employee. After an exhaustive study of all of the readings on the Tuaoi Stone, Sutton drew the following picture of this power source. (Note especially point 3).
The "stone" (1) became hot when used; (2) it was large; (3) it received its energy from the Sun and from elements that are and are not found in the Earth's atmosphere; (4) it consisted of prisms or a "glass;" (5) it employed induction methods; (6) it employed a kind of wave energy other than electromagnetic; (7) the energy could be emitted in a beam to which water and other matter is transparent; (8) the beam was invisible; (9) the beam transmitted enough power for the needs of a city; (10) it could be used to retard the aging process; (11) it consisted of two separate pieces -- a cylinder and a capstone; (12) the energy produced was concentrated between the two pieces; (13) representations of it will be found in Yucatan; (14) the crystal was cylindrical, six-sided, or was of hexagonal cross-section; (15) light waves were used for communications with extraterrestrial intelligence; and (16) misuse, accidental or otherwise, of the Stone caused [two] geological upheavals.
The Death Ray
(2/21/33) speaks of a "Death Ray" used by the Atlanteans. This ray
may have been produced by selective tuning of the Tuaoi Stone. Or it may have
been generated by a special crystal device similar to the Stone. Rays for killing,
healing, transportation, and the regeneration of one's physical body were also
used by the Atlanteans at various stages of their civilization. The Death Ray
used energies available in Earth's stratosphere and from cosmic rays. In a meeting
attended by representatives from various countries of the world, some 52,787
years ago, it was decided to use this ray to kill the many beasts then roaming
various parts of the Earth. This was to be done by sending out:
from various [ray-generating] central plants that which is termed in the present the Death Ray, or the super-cosmic ray, that which many are seeking into, which will give their lives much, from the stratosphere, or cosmic rays, that will be found in the next twenty-five years.
ray seems to be the same Death Ray that some 19,400 years ago was mistakenly
tuned too high and which:
....brought forth from the bowels of the Earth itself -- when turned into the sources of supply -- those destructions to portions of the [Atlantean] land . (364-11)
Cosmic Rays And Solar Flares
Cosmic "rays" are composed of highly energetic particles -- mostly protons and atomic nuclei -- that strike the Earth from space. According to one expert, "The simplest interpretation of their origin is that the highest-energy cosmic rays come from our galaxy, from sources in the large galactic halo." But others, studying the origin and make-up of extremely high-energy cosmic rays think that such rays are made up of a new, extra-galactic subatomic particle. G. Farrar and P. Bierman studied the five most energetic cosmic rays ever detected on Earth and found that their origins were in five compact quasars, or "quasi-stellar radio sources." These quasars are among the most powerful sources of energy in the universe. The nearest is four to five billion light years away; the furthest is 13 to 16 billion light years away. Perhaps these are the same quasars that emitted the cosmic rays that powered the Atlantean "super-cosmic ray".
Recent evidence indicates that cosmic rays influence Earth's climate.. H. Svensmark of the Danish Meteorological Institute has found that during the most recent 11-year activity cycle of the Sun, Earth's cloud cover was more closely correlated with the flux of cosmic rays coming from our galaxy than with the Sun's radiance. "Apparently, the solar magnetic field interacts with the cosmic rays. When strong, the Sun's field blocks more cosmic rays, which ionize air molecules in the lower atmosphere and in this way are thought to contribute to cloud cover and other weather-related phenomena."
cover has been found to be 3 to 4 percent greater at sunspot minimum (cosmic
ray maximum) than at sunspot maximum. And an indirect mechanism for cosmic
ray effects on clouds has been elucidated by B. Tinsley. Finally, N. Calder,
in his new book, The Manic Sun, claims that solar effects on global
warming are clear. They are caused by changes in the amount of cosmic rays,
and are large enough to invalidate the work of others, who attribute most of
the warming to human effects, such as carbon-dioxide emissions to the atmosphere.
Now this work on
cyclic changes in the flux of cosmic rays seems to resonate with the following
passage in 1602-3 where we read:
These [1998 Earth-change activities coming about] are at the periods when the cycle of the solar activity, or the years as related to the Sun's passage through the various spheres of activity become paramount or Catamount[12*] to the change between the Piscean and the Aquarian age. This is a gradual, not a cataclysmic activity in the experience of the Earth in this period.
Thus, it would
appear that in 1998 we entered what will become a "paramount" period
of solar-cycle activity. The word paramount implies "one superior to all
others with which we are familiar." And indeed, scientists have concluded
that 1998 was the warmest year of not only the decade, but quite possibly, of
the millennium. The reading implies that the effects of this paramount solar
cycle are part of Earth's evolution, as our Sun and planetary system moves into
new spheres of galactic influence. And we will all be affected by the new influences.
Does this mean that Earth's climate will begin to change greatly, or erratically?
Will climate changes cause food shortages? And will increased cosmic rays --
known to produce slight genetic alterations -- have a significant effect on
Visions of Phylos,The Thibetan
Finally, we turn to Phylos's vision of "solar heats," predicted to occur about now, here at the end of the Piscean Age. (See CEC for background on Phylos and his predictions, in A Dweller On Two Planets, 1952 Borden pub. Co. Los Angeles). Phylos describes the outbreak of a worldwide conflict that:
Nature completing, will leave living but one where now are many., for in that day none will pause to bury the slain until the evil is wrought, nor then, for the dead of the plagues will be as thousands for every one by violence. And all this because the love that should grace and soften men's hearts, each for all and all for each, dried up and became a mockery in the close of the ended cycle, leaving but scattered oases, few and far between. Nature follows man. Wherefore the waters of Earth will dry out, rains be withheld, cyclones sweep, and earthquake come such as was not since a man was on the earth; aye, I am mindful of Poseidia. But all of this will occur through natural causes, and in consonance with the selfishness, lust, greed, anger and general depravity of the Type. As these blaze in the human breast, so shall the air, dry and vaporless under brazen skies, develop solar heats [emphasis added] more fierce than history ever knew. A parched earth, furnace-like, piling all flesh mountains high; pestilences stalking unchecked. O ye! Blind to the Handwriting on the wall, which flickers still, though writ for a spent cycle. Turn now and read, while yet the last midnight stroke reverberates.
But Phylos's vision
may be mitigated! Consider Cayce's response to a person's question about whether
Phylos's vision of the end of the Age was "based on truth, especially in
its forecast for the United States."
As viewed by an entity separated from the whole, yes. As truth that may be implied by one who looks only to the Lamb, to the Son as a leader, no. Choose thou. (282-5)
The Fire Next Time
In 1944, Cayce gave reading 3653-1 for a woman who was said to have been one of "the eight souls in the Ark -- as the wife of a son of Noah." Cayce's source asked rhetorically:
Will this entity
see such [the Deluge] again in the Earth? Will it be among those who
may be given those directions as to how, where, the elect may be preserved for
the replenishing again of the Earth? Remember, not by water -- for it is the
mother of life in the Earth -- but rather by the elements, fire.
It is difficult
to assign a date in the future to this intimated burning of the Earth. Mentioned
only a single time in the readings, it seems not to fit with the many other
Earth-change readings that indicate catastrophic seismotectonic events directly
ahead. That is why I suggested in CEC (pp. 42-45) that if such Earth fire is
in the cards, it will probably be brought about by excessive volcanic activity.
But some say that this reading does fit with the Sun's "paramount"
activity mentioned in reading 1602-3 above, which activity is to occur in the
present solar cycle that we entered in 1998.
Note that on September 24, 1998, a geomagnetic storm occurred that measured 8.6 on a scale of 0 to 9. A storm of this intensity is seen only a few times per decade. The storm originated from an intense solar flare, one so strong that it blew some of Earth's atmosphere into space.. "This storm may be the harbinger of the next solar maximum due in the year 2000," said Rice University Professor, J. Freeman. And C. Seife asks,
"Could the Sun send out a monstrous flare powerful enough to melt the ice on Jupiter's moons, destroy much of the Earth's ozone layer and obliterate all our satellites?" It's possible, say astronomers who have studied other Sun-like stars in our Galaxy, which seem to produce enormous "superflares" about once a century. They are baffled by the fact that there are no historical records of similar explosions.
Roughly once or twice a decade, the eruption of [the Sun's] stellar material is powerful enough to send huge electric currents racing around the Earth's upper atmosphere, disrupting power grids and communications satellites. In 1989, one such explosion knocked out a power grid in Quebec.....A superflare on the Sun would be about 10,000 times as powerful as the explosion that caused the Canadian blackout...Although life on Earth would survive, the atmosphere would glow very brightly and half the ozone layer would be destroyed.
As to why a superflare has not occurred on the Sun in recorded history is unclear. "I think a consensus is emerging that our Sun is extraordinarily stable, suggests G. Gisler, an astronomer at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. We seem to have found a star that is extremely stable and friendly to life -- or we are just on a star that happens to be stable right now and will not always be so." Or perhaps we humans have been patient just enough since the Flood to keep the Sun from burning us up.
A Prehistoric Solar Conflagration?
Both Allen and DeLair, and LaViolette have brought together a wealth of geological and anthropological information which they interpret to show that around 12,600 B.P. (years Before the Present), the Earth experienced several catastrophic destructions. The former authors conclude that the destructions were due to a fragment of the Vela Supernova, which exploded around 13,000 B.P. They say that this fragment careened through our solar system 400 years later, around 12,600 years ago, disturbing various other planets as well as Earth.
believes that the evidence of catastrophic alterations to Earth points to a
"solar conflagration event." He relates the strong global warming
that began around 14,650 B.P., and the evidence of wild swings in Earth's geomagnetic
field, to the arrival of a galactic superwave that caused huge flares to erupt
from the Sun. These flares may have occurred off and on until about 12,700 B.P.,
after which the sun quieted down until now.
The basis of LaViolett's
hypothesis lies mainly in his working backward from research by N. Mörner
on magnetic signatures in dated layers of a sediment core from Gothenberg, Sweden.
In 1977, Mörner published a now famous paper in Quaternary Research
entitled "The Gothenburg Magnetic Excursion." Mörner's core data
record a 180š flip in Earth's geomagnetic pole around 12,700 B. P. Such a flip
could be the product of extremely strong solar-flare activity. And this suggested
to LaViolette that solar flares were responsible for burning the Earth and melting
the ice sheets. But melting of the continental glaciers actually began in the
central U.S. around 18,500 years ago, some 6,000 years earlier (CEC, p. 34).
that the history of the global conflagration has been passed down in the survival
myths of many peoples. He also provides evidence that the intensity and direction
of Earth's magnetic field "fluctuated irregularly from about 15,800 to
14,200 years ago. A particularly major geomagnetic excursion occurred around
14,200 B. P., when the Earth's north magnetic pole abruptly flipped southward
to point to an equatorial mid-Pacific location for around 10 to 50 years."
(See p. 187 in footnote 4).
But this excursion took place right in the middle of the period between 19,400 and 11,900 B.P. when the Cayce readings suggest that the Earth was undergoing a pole shift (see CEC, pp. 252-256) or a "shifting of the activities of the Earth itself" (644-1). This shift, whatever its nature, was caused by the enormous man-induced eruption brought forth from the bowels of the Earth itself (364-11). This man-induced eruption caused a portion of Atlantis near the Sargasso Sea to go "into the depths." One might expect all sorts of unusual geophysical phenomena to be taking place for thousands of years during such a shift, including excursions of the geomagnetic field.
As for what the Sun was doing 12,000 years ago, recall that reading 5757-1 clearly states that humankind itself affects the Sun by the nature of people's thoughts and actions (see the July 1998 issue). This must have been the case in the latter days of Atlantis some 15,000 to 11,900 years ago. Defiance of God led to societal turmoils, misuse of the powerful crystals, and volcanic eruptions and earthquakes. Nothing even remotely resembling a super galactic wave was ever mentioned in the readings. Nor is there anything about a wayward piece of a supernova or a solar conflagration event, although who is to say that one did not occur? Consider the climatic jolt just recently documented from studies of ice cores. It occurred 14,700 years ago. "Temperatures in Greenland jumped 5šC in less than 10 years--twice the warming that greenhouse gases are predicted to cause in the coming 100 years."14 Was this due to a sudden, massive shift in ocean circulation, or to a jerk in an otherwise smoothly proceeding pole shift, or to a solar conflagration event? Research continues. Time will tell.
Now according to reading 884-1, the climate on Atlantis changed significantly during the 19,400 to 11,940 B.P. period of progressive destruction.
Before that we find the entity was in that land now known or spoken of as the Atlantean, during those days when there were the attempts of those to bring quiet, to bring order out of chaos by the destructive forces that had made for the eruptions in the land that had divided the lands and had changed not only the temperate but to a more torrid region by the shifting of the activities of the Earth itself .
I suggested on page 252 of CEC that this climatic change was due to a gradual pole shift of perhaps 10š, as the North Pole moved from a position in northern Greenland to its present position, tracking -- roughly -- along the 37šW meridian. I thought that such a pole shift could be the meaning of "the shifting of the activities of the Earth itself." But perhaps something else was meant. The point here is that reading 884-1 does not suggest that solar flares were the cause of the changed Atlantean climate. But the readings suggest that a pole shift commenced in 19,400 B. P. and progressed over thousands of years. And such a shift would provide the answer to a long-standing question in the geosciences. How do we explain the rapid onset of melting of the ice sheets in Europe, Asia, and North America that began around 19,000 B.P.?
The Cayce readings
can be interpreted to suggest that the ice sheets were moved into progressively
warmer climatic zones by a gradual pole shift that began with the accidental
destruction of much of Atlantis in 19,400 B. P. As the poles continued
to shift over the next 7,500 years (until 11,900), many of the geophysical catastrophes
catalogued by Allen and Delair, and by LaViolette, could have occurred. This
does not mean that superflares were not produced on our Sun in those days. Indeed
we might expect same, in view of the readings' suggestion that rebellious humans
can produce disturbances on the Sun proportional to the degree of their denial
of the God force in man and Nature.
this final reading (820-1) on the reason behind and nature of the enormous eruptions
on Atlantis, beginning around 19,400 years ago and extending until 11,900 B.P.
See if it doesn't give us a hint, also, as to the possible origin of those "outside
forces" that impacted Earth in 1936.
Before that we find the entity was in the Atlantean land, during those periods when there began to be the rebellious forces that disputed those acts and laws pertaining to the communications with what is termed in the present as the unseen forces - or to those hierarchies that are given rule over activities in the various forms in the Earth. [Emphasis added].
The entity then, in the name of Al-Aar, was the ruler of those forces of the Law of One; and those activities that were raised against the entity's activities by the Belzebubs (?) ....Once lost in this direction,....the entity saw in those mighty upheavals from the destructive forces used for the people from the prisms' activities and from the fires that were started for the fires of the deeper inferno that brought to the surface those destructive forces as from nature's storehouse itself.
Do we have here
the answer to the meaning of "outside forces to the Earth in '36?"
Were they of the unseen forces from those hierarchies of intelligences that
have been given "rule over activities in the various forms in the Earth?"
1 Sugrue, T., 1943, The Story of Edgar Cayce (originally entitled There Is A River), A.R.E. Press, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23451.
2 Sugrue, T., June 21, 1941, "The Meaning of Edgar Cayce." See CD-ROM Report of Reading 294-202.
3 Hutton, W., 1997, A.R.E. Press, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23451.
4 Allen, D. and J. Delair, 1997, Bear & Co., Santa Fe, NM.
5 LaViolette, P., 1997, Starlane Publications, Schenectady, New York 12309.
6 Gilbert, G., and others, 1998, "Wavelet Analysis of the Chandler Wobble," Jour. Geophysical Research, v. 103, no. B11, pp. 27,069-27,098.
7 Hillas, M., 1998, "Cosmic Rays Without End," Nature, v. 395, Sep. 3,, p. 15.
8 "Super Cosmic Rays," Science Daily Internet posting of 10/24/98.
9 Scientific American, Jan. 1999.
10 Svensmark, H., and E. Fris-Christensen, 1997, Jour. Terrestrial Physics, v. 59, p. 1225.
11 Jour. Geophysical Research, 1996, v. 101, p. 29,701.
12 Calder, N., 1997, Pilkington Press, London.
* The word "Catamount" seems wholly out of place. It's capitalization is strange. The question mark indicates that the stenographer was perplexed by its use. In the 1996 American edition of The Oxford Dictionary,. catamount refers to any wild cat, and in British usage can mean "a wild quarrelsome person."
13 "Thank Our Lucky Star," New Scientist, 1/06/99.
R., 1999, Science, v. 283, p. 29.
Earth Changes : The Latest Evidence
Check out Hutton's latest book! This book deals with one of the hottest topics in America today! Changes in the Earth's surface, ocean, and atmosphere seem to be confirming many of the predictions of Edgar Cayce as well as the scientific theories of some of the most respected scientists in the field of geophysics. Geologist William Hutton points to patterns of change described in the Cayce readings as long ago as the 1930s and compares them with what is actually happening to our planet today.
Humanity's Survival of the Apocalypse
by Paul A. LaViolette
All material is copyrighted by THE MILLENNIUM GROUP and may not be used without their express written permission.